🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.